(2010/08/17 11:37), Robert Haas wrote:
>> I might have a reason why the script need to launch in single-user
>> mode, but it is not clear right now, sorry.
>
> Another point here is that I wonder if we really need to label system
> objects at all. Are you applying the same label to all of them?
2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei :
>> I don't really see what the advantage of doing this in single-user
>> mode is. If the overhead of permissions-checking is enough to matter,
>> maybe that's a sign we're doing something wrong.
>>
> Hmm... I guess the overhead is not a significant matter, because the
> nu
(2010/08/17 10:57), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei:
>> (2010/08/17 9:52), Robert Haas wrote:
>>> 2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei:
(2010/08/16 23:40), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei:
>> Although nobody paid an attention, it seems to me a problem to be fixed.
>>
2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei :
> (2010/08/17 9:52), Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei:
>>> (2010/08/16 23:40), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei:
> Although nobody paid an attention, it seems to me a problem to be fixed.
>
> The attached patch fixes the problem using a
(2010/08/17 9:52), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei:
>> (2010/08/16 23:40), Robert Haas wrote:
>>> 2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei:
Although nobody paid an attention, it seems to me a problem to be fixed.
The attached patch fixes the problem using a simple idea which adds
proc
2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei :
> (2010/08/16 23:40), Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei:
>>> Although nobody paid an attention, it seems to me a problem to be fixed.
>>>
>>> The attached patch fixes the problem using a simple idea which adds
>>> process_shared_preload_libraries() at PostgresMai
(2010/08/17 9:02), Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> 2010/8/17 KaiGai Kohei:
>> I want to kick this job in single-user mode, not normal processing mode,
>
> Does an explicit LOAD work in single-user mode?
> I think LOAD just after login works as same as it was preloaded,
> unless it allocates shared memor
2010/8/17 KaiGai Kohei :
> I want to kick this job in single-user mode, not normal processing mode,
Does an explicit LOAD work in single-user mode?
I think LOAD just after login works as same as it was preloaded,
unless it allocates shared memory.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
(2010/08/16 23:40), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei:
>> Although nobody paid an attention, it seems to me a problem to be fixed.
>>
>> The attached patch fixes the problem using a simple idea which adds
>> process_shared_preload_libraries() at PostgresMain() when we launched
>> it in si
2010/8/16 KaiGai Kohei :
> Although nobody paid an attention, it seems to me a problem to be fixed.
>
> The attached patch fixes the problem using a simple idea which adds
> process_shared_preload_libraries() at PostgresMain() when we launched
> it in single-user mode.
I have no confidence at all
Although nobody paid an attention, it seems to me a problem to be fixed.
The attached patch fixes the problem using a simple idea which adds
process_shared_preload_libraries() at PostgresMain() when we launched
it in single-user mode.
Thanks,
(2010/08/05 15:08), KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> I found out
I found out "shared_preload_libraries" setting is ignored when we launch
postgres in single user mode.
In this case, postgres command is launched with "--single" argument,
then the main() directly invokes PostgresMain(); without going through
PostmasterMain() which calls process_shared_preload_lib
12 matches
Mail list logo
