Re: [HACKERS] static libperl?

2005-08-24 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Earlier today I noticed these lines in this buildfarm log http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=platypusdt=2005-08-16%2002:05:00 /usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/mach/CORE/libperl.a(perl.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S can not be used

[HACKERS] static libperl?

2005-08-16 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Earlier today I noticed these lines in this buildfarm log http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=platypusdt=2005-08-16%2002:05:00 ccache gcc -O3 -pipe -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -g -fPIC -DPIC -shared

Re: [HACKERS] static libperl?

2005-08-16 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/mach/CORE/libperl.a(perl.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC Does that mean that we are attempting to link against a static libperl.a? I thought we

Re: [HACKERS] static libperl?

2005-08-16 Thread Johnny Lam
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Earlier today I noticed these lines in this buildfarm log http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=platypusdt=2005-08-16%2002:05:00 ccache gcc -O3 -pipe -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -g -fPIC -DPIC -shared

Re: [HACKERS] static libperl?

2005-08-16 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/mach/CORE/libperl.a(perl.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC Does that mean that we are attempting to link against a