Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:34:28PM +0100, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
The reason why I came up with this posting is slightly different: Assume
a JDBC application which works with PostgreSQL + some other database. If
you want to use both databases without PostgreSQL being un
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:34:28PM +0100, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> The reason why I came up with this posting is slightly different: Assume
> a JDBC application which works with PostgreSQL + some other database. If
> you want to use both databases without PostgreSQL being unnecessarily
> sl
Tom Lane wrote:
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Recently I have come across a simple issue which made me think about it.
When we create a tmp table (SELECT INTO, CREATE TABLE AS) the planner
won't know anything about its content after creating it.
Run ANALYZ
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Recently I have come across a simple issue which made me think about it.
> When we create a tmp table (SELECT INTO, CREATE TABLE AS) the planner
> won't know anything about its content after creating it.
Run ANALYZE on the tem
Recently I have come across a simple issue which made me think about it.
When we create a tmp table (SELECT INTO, CREATE TABLE AS) the planner
won't know anything about its content after creating it.
Many people use temp tables heavy when the amount of data for a certain
analysis has to be reduce
