Re: [HACKERS] symbol not found in plpgsql.so

2000-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Btw., something that has struck me as odd is that the hpux template with > the native compiler sets CFLAGS='-Wl,-E -Ae'. I know what the -Ae is for, > but the -Wl,-E should probably not be in every compilation command, > no? (in particular since LDFL

Re: [HACKERS] symbol not found in plpgsql.so

2000-10-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: > On HPUX, for example, the loader has to be given a -E switch when > linking the postgres executable. Btw., something that has struck me as odd is that the hpux template with the native compiler sets CFLAGS='-Wl,-E -Ae'. I know what the -Ae is for, but the -Wl,-E should probab

Re: [HACKERS] symbol not found in plpgsql.so

2000-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
"Frederick W. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm getting the following error when I add a row to a table that has a > trigger set for a plpgsql function. I did a nm on the plpgsql.so file and > it lists CurrentMemoryContext as being in there, so I don't know why it > can't find it. > "DBD:

[HACKERS] symbol not found in plpgsql.so

2000-10-05 Thread Frederick W. Reimer
I sent an email on this the other day, but didn't see it pop up in the list and there have been no responses, so I don't know if it got through. Sorry if this is a dup. I'm getting the following error when I add a row to a table that has a trigger set for a plpgsql function. I did a nm on the