Re: [HACKERS] tzdata 2016j

2016-12-09 Thread Alvaro Herrera
David Fetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:52:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Vladimir Borodin writes: > > > Any chance to get tzdata 2016j in supported branches? > > > > When the next scheduled releases come around (February), we'll update > > to whatever tzdata is

Re: [HACKERS] tzdata 2016j

2016-12-06 Thread Vladimir Borodin
> 6 дек. 2016 г., в 19:19, David Fetter написал(а): > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:52:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Vladimir Borodin writes: >>> Any chance to get tzdata 2016j in supported branches? >> >> When the next scheduled releases come around

Re: [HACKERS] tzdata 2016j

2016-12-06 Thread David Fetter
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:52:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Vladimir Borodin writes: > > Any chance to get tzdata 2016j in supported branches? > > When the next scheduled releases come around (February), we'll update > to whatever tzdata is current at that time. I'm guessing

Re: [HACKERS] tzdata 2016j

2016-12-06 Thread Tom Lane
Vladimir Borodin writes: > Any chance to get tzdata 2016j in supported branches? When the next scheduled releases come around (February), we'll update to whatever tzdata is current at that time. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing

[HACKERS] tzdata 2016j

2016-12-06 Thread Vladimir Borodin
Hi all. Any chance to get tzdata 2016j in supported branches? -- May the force be with you… https://simply.name