On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:17:51PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's an updated version of the experimental qCache patch I
> posted a couple days ago (which is a port of Karel Zak's 7.0
> work to CVS HEAD).
I have a question, what the Dllist and malloc()? I think it's
nothing nice
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 06:05:59PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:34:45 -0700
>
> I'm not saying it's a bad idea, I just think I'd like to
> concentrate on the locally-cached plans for now and see if
> there is a need to add shared plans later.
Yes, later we can use shared m
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:17:51PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's an updated version of the experimental qCache patch I
> posted a couple days ago (which is a port of Karel Zak's 7.0
> work to CVS HEAD).
>
> Changes:
>
> - fix segfault in EXECUTE under some circumstances (report
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm planning to re-implement PREPARE/EXECUTE with support only
> > for locally-prepared plans, using the existing patch as a
> > guide. The result should be a simpler patch -- once it's
> > in CVS we can worry about more advanced plan caching
> > techi
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm planning to re-implement PREPARE/EXECUTE with support only
> > for locally-prepared plans, using the existing patch as a
> > guide. The result should be a simpler patch -- once it's
> > in CVS we can worry about more advanced plan caching
> > techi
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm planning to re-implement PREPARE/EXECUTE with support only
> for locally-prepared plans, using the existing patch as a
> guide. The result should be a simpler patch -- once it's
> in CVS we can worry about more advanced plan caching
> techiques. Any co
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:34:45 -0700
"Dann Corbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I've tentatively decided that I think the best
> way to go forward is to rewrite this code. IMHO the utility of
> plans cached in shared memory is fairly limited, but the
> code that implements this adds a lot o
-Original Message-
From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:18 PM
To: PostgreSQL Hackers
Subject: [HACKERS] updated qCache
Hi all,
Here's an updated version of the experimental qCache patch I
posted a couple days ago (which is a port of Karel
Hi all,
Here's an updated version of the experimental qCache patch I
posted a couple days ago (which is a port of Karel Zak's 7.0
work to CVS HEAD).
Changes:
- fix segfault in EXECUTE under some circumstances (reported
by Barry Lind)
- fix some memory leaks (thanks to Karel Zak)
- write more
