Re: [HACKERS] what about _PG_fini

2009-12-23 Thread Cédric Villemain
2009/12/23 Tom Lane : > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= > writes: >> I wonder what is the future of "_PG_fini", documentation say at [1]: >> "Note that _PG_fini will only be called during an unload of the file, >> not during process termination. (Presently, unloads are disabled and >> will ne

Re: [HACKERS] what about _PG_fini

2009-12-23 Thread Tom Lane
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= writes: > I wonder what is the future of "_PG_fini", documentation say at [1]: > "Note that _PG_fini will only be called during an unload of the file, > not during process termination. (Presently, unloads are disabled and > will never occur, but this may change

[HACKERS] what about _PG_fini

2009-12-23 Thread Cédric Villemain
Hello dear hackers, I wonder what is the future of "_PG_fini", documentation say at [1]: "Note that _PG_fini will only be called during an unload of the file, not during process termination. (Presently, unloads are disabled and will never occur, but this may change in the future.)" Since 8.2 it i