2009/12/23 Tom Lane :
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?=
> writes:
>> I wonder what is the future of "_PG_fini", documentation say at [1]:
>> "Note that _PG_fini will only be called during an unload of the file,
>> not during process termination. (Presently, unloads are disabled and
>> will ne
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= writes:
> I wonder what is the future of "_PG_fini", documentation say at [1]:
> "Note that _PG_fini will only be called during an unload of the file,
> not during process termination. (Presently, unloads are disabled and
> will never occur, but this may change
Hello dear hackers,
I wonder what is the future of "_PG_fini", documentation say at [1]:
"Note that _PG_fini will only be called during an unload of the file,
not during process termination. (Presently, unloads are disabled and
will never occur, but this may change in the future.)"
Since 8.2 it i