On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, David Fetter wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 07:01:33PM -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote:
Let me know if you see any bugs or issues with this code, and I am
open to suggestions for further regression tests ;)
I have not heard anything, so I guess at this point I should figure
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Put together a patch to add these functions to core. I could put them
directly in regexp.c, so the support functions could stay static. My
concern here is that I don't know if there are any functions currently
in core with OUT parameters.
As of
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:23:58AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Put together a patch to add these functions to core. I could put them
directly in regexp.c, so the support functions could stay static. My
concern here is that I don't know if there are
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Put together a patch to add these functions to core. I could put them
directly in regexp.c, so the support functions could stay static. My
concern here is that I don't know if there are any functions
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
As of 8.2 there are.
Could you give me the name of one in pg_proc.h so I can see how I should
go about adding one there?
select * from pg_proc where proargmodes is not null;
regards, tom lane
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, David Fetter wrote:
Yes, although it might have the same name, as in regex_match(pattern
TEXT, string TEXT, return_pre_and_post BOOL).
The data structure could be something like
TYPE matches (
prematch TEXT,
matchTEXT[],
postmatch TEXT
)
I just
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Jeremy Drake wrote:
jeremyd=# select * from regexp_matches('foobarbequebaz',
$re$(bar)(beque)$re$, false);
prematch | fullmatch | matches | postmatch
--+---+-+---
\N | \N| {bar,beque} | \N
(1 row)
I just changed
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:54:30AM -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Jeremy Drake wrote:
jeremyd=# select * from regexp_matches('foobarbequebaz',
$re$(bar)(beque)$re$, false);
prematch | fullmatch | matches | postmatch
--+---+-+---
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Jeremy Drake wrote:
I just coded up for this:
CREATE FUNCTION regexp_matches(IN str text, IN pattern text) RETURNS
text[]
AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME', 'regexp_matches'
LANGUAGE C IMMUTABLE STRICT;
CREATE FUNCTION regexp_matches(
IN str text, IN pattern text,
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want to ask, should I break with following substring's precedent, and
put the pattern first (as most people probably would expect), or should I
break with perl's precedent and put the pattern second (to behave like
substring)?
All of SQL's pattern
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:56:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want to ask, should I break with following substring's
precedent, and put the pattern first (as most people probably
would expect), or should I break with perl's precedent and put the
I am wanting to write some new C functions which leverage postgresql's
existing regexp code in an extension module. I notice that the functions
RE_compile_and_cache and RE_compile_and_execute in
src/backend/util/regexp.c contain the code necessary to connect the regexp
code in src/backend/regex
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there some specific reason that these functions are static,
Yeah: not cluttering the global namespace. I'm not excited about
exporting everything that anybody could possibly want access to;
that just makes it harder to maintain the code. When you see a
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there some specific reason that these functions are static,
Yeah: not cluttering the global namespace.
Is there a reason for not putting your new code itself into regexp.c?
Not really, I just figured it would be
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:11:30PM -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there some specific reason that these functions are static,
Yeah: not cluttering the global namespace.
Is there a reason for not putting your
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, David Fetter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:11:30PM -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote:
Anyway, the particular thing I was writing was a function like
substring(str FROM pattern) which instead of returning just the
first match group, would return an array of text containing
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:16:54PM -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, David Fetter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:11:30PM -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote:
Anyway, the particular thing I was writing was a function like
substring(str FROM pattern) which instead of returning just
17 matches
Mail list logo
