Hi, Tom,
Tom Lane schrieb:
Yeah, but only because you have to do it explicitly. I was wondering
whether we couldn't bury that mechanism under the hood. (In particular,
given the improved support in 8.0 for anonymous record types, we could
in theory have the backend invent a record type
Markus Schaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane schrieb:
given the improved support in 8.0 for anonymous record types, we could
in theory have the backend invent a record type on-the-fly to match
whatever list of OUT parameters a particular function has.)
It would not be necessarily on the
