The attached patch is additional regression tests of ALTER FUNCTION with
LEAKPROOF based on your patch.
It also moves create_function_3 into the group with create_aggregate and so on.
Thanks,
2012/2/14 Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp:
2012/2/14 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Feb
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
The attached patch is additional regression tests of ALTER FUNCTION with
LEAKPROOF based on your patch.
It also moves create_function_3 into the group with create_aggregate and so
on.
Committed, thanks.
--
Robert Haas
2012/2/14 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
I rebased the patch due to the updates of pg_proc.h.
Please see the newer one. Thanks,
Thanks, committed. I think, though, that some further adjustment is
needed here,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
I could not find out where is the origin of grammer conflicts, although
it does not conflict with any options within ALTER FUNCTION.
Do you think the idea of ALTER ... NOT LEAKPROOF should be
integrated within v9.2
2012/2/14 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
I could not find out where is the origin of grammer conflicts, although
it does not conflict with any options within ALTER FUNCTION.
Do you think the idea of ALTER ... NOT
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
I rebased the patch due to the updates of pg_proc.h.
Please see the newer one. Thanks,
Thanks, committed. I think, though, that some further adjustment is
needed here, because you currently can't do ALTER FUNCTION ... NO
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
2012/1/21 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
I marked the default leakproof function according to the criteria that
does not leak contents of the
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
I marked the default leakproof function according to the criteria that
does not leak contents of the argument.
Indeed, timestamp_ne_timestamptz() has a code path that rises
an error of timestamp out of range message. Is
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
BTW, can you also resubmit the leakproof stuff as a separate patch for
the last CF? Want to make sure we get that into 9.2, if at all
possible.
Yes, it shall be attached on the next message.
The attached patch adds
