9.1 release scheduling (was Re: [HACKERS] reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch)

2011-06-07 Thread Tom Lane
Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: Actually, the summer is *excellent* from a publicity perspective ... at least, June and July are. Both of those months are full of US conferences whose PR we can piggyback on to make a splash. August is really the only bad month from a PR

Re: 9.1 release scheduling (was Re: [HACKERS] reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch)

2011-06-07 Thread Thom Brown
On 7 June 2011 19:32, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: Actually, the summer is *excellent* from a publicity perspective ... at least, June and July are.  Both of those months are full of US conferences whose PR we can piggyback on to make a splash.

Re: 9.1 release scheduling (was Re: [HACKERS] reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch)

2011-06-07 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote: Speaking of which, is it now safe to remove the NOT VALID constraints don't dump properly issue from the blocker list since the fix has been committed? I hope so, because I just did that (before noticing this email from you). --

Re: 9.1 release scheduling (was Re: [HACKERS] reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch)

2011-06-07 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar jun 07 13:53:23 -0400 2011: On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote: Speaking of which, is it now safe to remove the NOT VALID constraints don't dump properly issue from the blocker list since the fix has been committed?