Kerberos includes (was Re: [HACKERS] Port report: Fedora Core 3 x86_64)

2004-12-19 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: [ concerning a discussion about Kerberos' com_err.h being in /usr/include/et/ on some systems ] Actually, I'm wondering why we directly include com_err.h at all. At least in the version of krb5.h I have here, that file is included by krb5.h; so both backend/libpq/auth.c and

Re: Kerberos includes (was Re: [HACKERS] Port report: Fedora Core 3 x86_64)

2004-12-19 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane said: I wrote: [ concerning a discussion about Kerberos' com_err.h being in /usr/include/et/ on some systems ] Actually, I'm wondering why we directly include com_err.h at all. At least in the version of krb5.h I have here, that file is included by krb5.h; so both

Re: Kerberos includes (was Re: [HACKERS] Port report: Fedora Core 3 x86_64)

2004-12-19 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane said: Accordingly, I think we should just avoid the whole problem of exactly where com_err.h lives by removing the #includes for it as well as the configure test for it. Works for me. I'm not sure why the reasoning only applies to 8.0 - is it