Heikki Linnakangas writes:
>>>
>>> I think we need to fix all of those, and backpatch. Per attached.
>>
>> Yikes! Looks sane to me.
>
> Ok thanks, committed. It didn't apply cleanly to 9.0, 9.1 and 9.2, so
> the patch for those branches looks a bit different.
Great. Are you looking at the actu
On 11/25/2014 01:37 PM, Alex Shulgin wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
On 11/24/2014 06:05 PM, Alex Shulgin wrote:
The first patch is not on topic, I just spotted this missing check.
*** a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
--- b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
*** conninfo_a
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> On 11/24/2014 06:05 PM, Alex Shulgin wrote:
>> The first patch is not on topic, I just spotted this missing check.
>
>> *** a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
>> --- b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
>> *** conninfo_array_parse(const char *const *
>> *
On 11/24/2014 06:05 PM, Alex Shulgin wrote:
The first patch is not on topic, I just spotted this missing check.
*** a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
--- b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
*** conninfo_array_parse(const char *const *
*** 4402,4407
--- 4402,4415
