On 27-01-2015 AM 05:46, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 1/25/15 7:42 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
On 21-01-2015 PM 07:26, Amit Langote wrote:
Ok, I will limit myself to focusing on following things at the moment:
* Provide syntax in CREATE TABLE to declare partition key
While working on this, I stumbled
On 1/25/15 7:42 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
On 21-01-2015 PM 07:26, Amit Langote wrote:
Ok, I will limit myself to focusing on following things at the moment:
* Provide syntax in CREATE TABLE to declare partition key
While working on this, I stumbled upon the question of how we deal with
any
On 21-01-2015 PM 07:26, Amit Langote wrote:
Ok, I will limit myself to focusing on following things at the moment:
* Provide syntax in CREATE TABLE to declare partition key
While working on this, I stumbled upon the question of how we deal with
any index definitions following from constraints
On 21-01-2015 AM 01:42, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Amit Langote
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Specifically, do we regard a partitions as pg_inherits children of its
partitioning parent?
I don't think this is totally an all-or-nothing decision. I think
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Amit Langote
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Specifically, do we regard a partitions as pg_inherits children of its
partitioning parent?
I don't think this is totally an all-or-nothing decision. I think
everyone is agreed that we need to not break things
On 17-01-2015 AM 02:34, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Amit Langote
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
* It has been repeatedly pointed out that we may want to decouple
partitioning from inheritance because implementing partitioning as an
extension of inheritance
On 20-01-2015 AM 10:48, Amit Langote wrote:
On 17-01-2015 AM 02:34, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Amit Langote
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
* It is desirable to treat partitions as pg_class relations with perhaps
a new relkind(s). We may want to choose an
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Amit Langote
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
* It has been repeatedly pointed out that we may want to decouple
partitioning from inheritance because implementing partitioning as
On 19-01-2015 PM 12:37, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Amit Langote
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
I wonder if we could add a clause like DISTRIBUTED BY to complement
PARTITION ON that
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Amit Langote
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
* It has been repeatedly pointed out that we may want to decouple
partitioning from inheritance because implementing partitioning as an
extension of inheritance mechanism means that we have to keep all the
On 06-01-2015 PM 03:40, Amit Langote wrote:
I agree that while we are discussing these points, we could also be
discussing how we solve problems of existing partitioning implementation
using whatever the above things end up being. Proposed approaches to
solve those problems might be useful
11 matches
Mail list logo
