I've wondered and am still wondering what a lot of these benchmark tests
are out to prove.
In this case, the "benchmark test" was not out to prove anything. It was
an good-faith result of a porting effort with a suprising (to the
tester) result.
I'm not sure that any PostgreSQL advocate
Still...Regardless of what database they're running, either their
abstraction layer is shit or their queries really need optimized. Is that
perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
significantly above 10/sec?
I think this could be because they used real killer
uot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
"Michael Fork" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Poul L.Christiansen"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "pgsql-general" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "pgsql-hackers"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL]
At 09:43 AM 11/13/00 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made it all the way through the article. I'll summarize it for you:
Postgres - hooray!
MySQL - boo!
Since this is an open source database article linked off of slashdot, I
imagine they're getting pounded.
Why is all this e-mail showing up
At 01:53 PM 11/15/00 -0500, markw wrote:
I'd rather not pollute the application's SQL with postgres-isms. Not that I
don't love postgres, but there are always critics looking for a reason to use
Oracle or (gasp) MS-SQL.
Define some global variable with the name of the database being run
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, carl garland wrote:
perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
significantly above 10/sec?
I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg. They are
using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the additional
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, carl garland wrote:
# perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
# significantly above 10/sec?
#
# I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg. They are
# using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the
On Lun 13 Nov 2000 13:22, Robert D. Nelson wrote:
Still...Regardless of what database they're running, either their
abstraction layer is shit or their queries really need optimized. Is that
perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
significantly above 10/sec?
In the
markw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just a question, however, what is the feeling about the way statistics are
currently being calculated?
They suck, no question about it ;-)
My feeling is that some sort of windowing
algorithm be used to normalize the statistics to the majority of the entries
perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
significantly above 10/sec?
I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg. They are
using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the additional
overhead of making the db connection. Now if
At 09:27 AM 11/15/00 -0800, Tom Samplonius wrote:
AOLServer isn't the only system that can pool database connections, so
can servlets/JSP, ColdFusion, ASP, etc. No doubt AOLServer would be more
widely accepted if it used something other than TCL.
There are two separate modules that support
Andrew McMillan wrote:
mlw wrote:
My music database has 50,000 arises and 210,000 albums. Many artists
have only one or 2 entries in the albums table (for the youngsters, CD
table ;-). About 34,000 have the integer key for "Various Artists" as
their artist entry, and another few
And now it's on www.slashdot.org ...
http://slashdot.org/articles/00/11/13/1342208.shtml
Poul L. Christiansen
Michael Fork wrote:
Thought this may be of interest to some...
http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim20001112.php3
Michael Fork - CCNA - MCP - A+
Network Support - Toledo
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
And now it's on www.slashdot.org ...
http://slashdot.org/articles/00/11/13/1342208.shtml
Poul L. Christiansen
Michael Fork wrote:
Thought this may be of interest to some...
http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim20001112.php3
And now it's on www.slashdot.org ...
http://slashdot.org/articles/00/11/13/1342208.shtml
Poul L. Christiansen
Michael Fork wrote:
Thought this may be of interest to some...
http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim20001112.php3
Michael Fork - CCNA - MCP - A+
Network Support - Toledo
I made it all the way through the article. I'll summarize it for you:
Postgres - hooray!
MySQL - boo!
Yeah, and that's about it. No analysis or anything. Disappointing, after
waiting so long for the pages to load.
Since this is an open source database article linked off of slashdot, I
imagine
16 matches
Mail list logo
