RE: [HACKERS] Status of new relation file naming

2000-09-14 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> > So, I assume that you vote YES on this subject? -:) > > (As far as I remember, it was your idea). > > > > Yes. UNIQUE_ID file names: Hiroshi, Marc, Vadim We can use oids as unique ids, but these were another oids -:) Vadim

RE: [HACKERS] Status of new relation file naming

2000-09-14 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
> -Original Message- > From: Mikheev, Vadim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Philip Warner mentioned about the advantage of random number. > > It's exactly what I've wanted to say. > > > > >> it removes the temptation to write utilities that rely on > > >> the internal representation of o

RE: [HACKERS] Status of new relation file naming

2000-09-14 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> Philip Warner mentioned about the advantage of random number. > It's exactly what I've wanted to say. > > >> it removes the temptation to write utilities that rely on > >> the internal representation of our data. > > It is preferable that file naming rule is encapsulated so that we > can change

RE: [HACKERS] Status of new relation file naming

2000-09-14 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Mikheev, Vadim wrote: > > > > Rename... Why would we need in rename with OID filenames? > > > > Andreas seems to refer to in place replacement of OID files e.g. > > using your *relink*. > > Sorry, I've messed things for myself. > > Ok. In short, I vote for UNIQUE_ID (unr

RE: [HACKERS] Status of new relation file naming

2000-09-14 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
> -Original Message- > From: Mikheev, Vadim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Rename... Why would we need in rename with OID filenames? > > > > Andreas seems to refer to in place replacement of OID files e.g. > > using your *relink*. > > Sorry, I've messed things for myself. > > Ok. In sho

RE: [HACKERS] Status of new relation file naming

2000-09-14 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> > Rename... Why would we need in rename with OID filenames? > > Andreas seems to refer to in place replacement of OID files e.g. > using your *relink*. Sorry, I've messed things for myself. Ok. In short, I vote for UNIQUE_ID (unrelated to pg_class.oid) file names. I think that it's better to

Re: [HACKERS] Status of new relation file naming

2000-09-14 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote: > Rename... Why would we need in rename with OID filenames? Andreas seems to refer to in place replacement of OID files e.g. using your *relink*. Regards. Hiroshi Inoue

RE: [HACKERS] Status of new relation file naming

2000-09-14 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
Rename... Why would we need in rename with OID filenames? Ok, let's start with OID (*without tablename prefix|suffix*) filenames and we'll see later how it will work. So, could someone implement OID filenames? (Please use RelFileNode structure). Vadim > > > You have to tell us whether you plan

RE: [HACKERS] Status of new relation file naming

2000-09-13 Thread Philip Warner
At 10:48 13/09/00 -0700, Mikheev, Vadim wrote: >> My vote is for a random number, and then someone can write >> the tools to display the file info. I'll even volunteer to >> work on them... > >Ok. If someone will decide to implement this please try to use >RelFileNode structure defined in storage