Zeugswetter Andreas SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is intuitive. The bug was iirc, that you saw 2 versions of the same row
in the second select statement (= 2 rows returned by second select).
I think we should be extremely wary of assuming that we have a clear
characterization of "what the
It is intuitive. The bug was iirc, that you saw 2 versions
of the same row in the second select statement (= 2 rows
returned by second select).
I think we should be extremely wary of assuming that we have a clear
characterization of "what the bug is", let alone "how to fix it".
The
-Original Message-
From: Mikheev, Vadim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It is intuitive. The bug was iirc, that you saw 2 versions
of the same row in the second select statement (= 2 rows
returned by second select).
I think we should be extremely wary of assuming that we
