On sön, 2011-05-08 at 19:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I believe that the make check target in src/test/isolation is
fundamentally unportable, as is illustrated by the fact that buildfarm
member coypu is currently choking on it. The reason is that the
pg_isolation_regress program depends on
On 02/29/2012 02:33 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On sön, 2011-05-08 at 19:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I believe that the make check target in src/test/isolation is
fundamentally unportable, as is illustrated by the fact that buildfarm
member coypu is currently choking on it. The reason is that
On 05/08/2011 09:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 05/08/2011 07:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I believe that the make check target in src/test/isolation is
fundamentally unportable, as is illustrated by the fact that buildfarm
member coypu is currently choking on it. The reason is that the
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
What's a bit annoying is that these tests were checked in without a
vestige of MSVC support, and nobody pinged the usual suspects (i.e.
Magnus and me) to ask for help in providing it,
Speaking of pinging Windows people, have either of you noticed
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
While we could maybe hack this to the point where it works (on some
platforms) by dynamically linking libpq from the source tree, I don't
think it's worth the trouble.
How is this different from the regular case with
Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu writes:
How is this different from the regular case with pg_regress?
pg_regress doesn't link in libpq.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On 05/08/2011 07:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I believe that the make check target in src/test/isolation is
fundamentally unportable, as is illustrated by the fact that buildfarm
member coypu is currently choking on it. The reason is that the
pg_isolation_regress program depends on libpq, and in
