Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-20 Thread Magnus Hagander
2009/11/20 Heikki Linnakangas : > Kris Jurka wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >>> I've cleaned up the git repo, and re-enabled the mirror script. From >>> what I can tell it works fine. In theory you will need to use force >>> mode if you pulled the broken commit that was re

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-20 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Kris Jurka wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >>> I've cleaned up the git repo, and re-enabled the mirror script. From >>> what I can tell it works fine. In theory you will need to use force >>> mode if you pulled t

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-20 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Kris Jurka wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> I've cleaned up the git repo, and re-enabled the mirror script. From >> what I can tell it works fine. In theory you will need to use force >> mode if you pulled the broken commit that was removed (the one with >> the wrong messa

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-20 Thread Kris Jurka
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Magnus Hagander wrote: I've cleaned up the git repo, and re-enabled the mirror script. From what I can tell it works fine. In theory you will need to use force mode if you pulled the broken commit that was removed (the one with the wrong message), but it seems this is not

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-19 Thread Magnus Hagander
2009/11/16 Peter Eisentraut : > On mån, 2009-11-16 at 10:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Heikki Linnakangas writes: >> > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:29, David Fetter wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:56:54AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Yeah, sorry guys.

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-16 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On mån, 2009-11-16 at 10:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas writes: > > Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:29, David Fetter wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:56:54AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Yeah, sorry guys. I fixed the CVS log message now. >

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-16 Thread Tom Lane
Heikki Linnakangas writes: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:29, David Fetter wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:56:54AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Yeah, sorry guys. I fixed the CVS log message now. >> So it's not only not strange, I'm very happy it didn't pull

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-16 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > So we could rewrite the git history too, and I think it would be quite > nice to have the right commit message there as well. But I don't care > enough to volunteer to do the legwork. If we are going to do it, we > should do it as soon as possible, while we're only a cou

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-16 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:05, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:29, David Fetter wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:56:54AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Yeah, sorry guys.  I fixed the CVS log message now. >>> Strangely, the git repo still

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-16 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:29, David Fetter wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:56:54AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> Yeah, sorry guys. I fixed the CVS log message now. >> Strangely, the git repo still shows the old message. For the record, >> there's the new one:

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-15 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:29, David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:56:54AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On sön, 2009-11-15 at 17:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> > David Fetter writes: >> > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:09:14AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> > >> Peter Eisentraut wr

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-15 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:56:54AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On sön, 2009-11-15 at 17:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > David Fetter writes: > > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:09:14AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > >> Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > >>> /home/peter/commit-msg > > >> er, what? > > >

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On sön, 2009-11-15 at 17:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter writes: > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:09:14AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >>> /home/peter/commit-msg > >> er, what? > > I'm suspecting a misfired script somewhere. > > No doubt "cvs commit -m ~/comm

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

2009-11-15 Thread Tom Lane
David Fetter writes: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:09:14AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> /home/peter/commit-msg >> er, what? > I'm suspecting a misfired script somewhere. No doubt "cvs commit -m ~/commit-msg" instead of "cvs commit -F ~/commit-msg" ... I think I've ma