Thom Brown writes:
> On 7 March 2011 22:39, Robert Haas wrote:
>> That's not really a typo so much as a think-o, I think. Maybe a
>> little more text would help clarify: A column-specific trigger (one
>> defined using the UPDATE OF
>> column_name syntax) will fire
>> when...
>>
>> It should rea
On 7 March 2011 23:43, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 7 March 2011 22:39, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
This was spotted by someone who sent in a doc comment, although didn't
go with their sugges
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 7 March 2011 22:39, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>>> This was spotted by someone who sent in a doc comment, although didn't
>>> go with their suggestion. Patch attached.
>>
>> That's not really a
On 7 March 2011 22:39, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> This was spotted by someone who sent in a doc comment, although didn't
>> go with their suggestion. Patch attached.
>
> That's not really a typo so much as a think-o, I think. Maybe a
> little more
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> This was spotted by someone who sent in a doc comment, although didn't
> go with their suggestion. Patch attached.
That's not really a typo so much as a think-o, I think. Maybe a
little more text would help clarify: A column-specific trigger (