Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] PostgreSQL on AIX

2002-06-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote: > > > Anyway, I am pretty sure that PostgreSQL is not the culprit here. As it > > happens this project is back on the table for me so it is interesting that > > your email popped up now. I just compiled the latest version of PostgreSQL > > on my AIX system an

Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] PostgreSQL on AIX

2002-06-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
Also, Tatsuo uses AIX a lot and knows all the issues. --- Travis Hoyt wrote: > I've been using PosgreSQL 7.2 on AIX 4.3.3 with no probelms at all. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL P

Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] PostgreSQL on AIX

2002-06-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > On June 5, 2002 12:33 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > > > On May 13, 2002 12:50 am, Rajesh Kumar Mallah. wrote: > > Catching up on an old mailbox, Bruce? :-) > > > > Now if only I could get IBM to understand that. They still claim that my > > >

Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] PostgreSQL on AIX

2002-06-07 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
> Anyway, I am pretty sure that PostgreSQL is not the culprit here. As it > happens this project is back on the table for me so it is interesting that > your email popped up now. I just compiled the latest version of PostgreSQL > on my AIX system and it generated lots of errors and then comp

Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] PostgreSQL on AIX

2002-06-06 Thread Travis Hoyt
I've been using PosgreSQL 7.2 on AIX 4.3.3 with no probelms at all. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of D'Arcy J.M. Cain Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 6:35 AM To: Bruce Momjian; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subjec

Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] PostgreSQL on AIX

2002-06-06 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On June 5, 2002 12:33 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote: > D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > > On May 13, 2002 12:50 am, Rajesh Kumar Mallah. wrote: Catching up on an old mailbox, Bruce? :-) > > Now if only I could get IBM to understand that. They still claim that my > > problem is that PostgreSQL (an "unsuppor