On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:49:11PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
and it
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:20:13AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
Thanks
Hi,
On 06/11/15 06:15, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
and it will eventually appear here:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
Secondly, Robert didn't credit himself as an author in his commit
message for the abbreviated keys infrastructure + text opclass support
*at all*. However, I think that Robert should be listed as a secondary
author of the
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
Secondly, Robert didn't credit himself as an author in his commit
message for the abbreviated keys infrastructure + text opclass support
*at all*.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
+ listitem
+ para
+Improve the speed of sorting character and numeric fields (Robert
+Haas, Peter
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
* Add sortsupport (support for non-SQL callable interface for
comparators) with abbreviation capability to text/varlena operator
class. This significantly accelerates sorting on text columns.
(4ea51cdfe85 too, but also
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:20:13AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can
view
the
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
and it will eventually appear here:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 02:00:08PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
On 2015-06-11 PM 01:15, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
and it will eventually appear
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:13:26PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Improve hash creation and lookup performance (Tomas Vondra,
Teodor Sigaev, Tom Lane, Robert Haas)
I suggest haveing two separate items. One
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Improve hash creation and lookup performance (Tomas Vondra,
Teodor Sigaev, Tom Lane, Robert Haas)
I suggest haveing two separate items. One of those is about the Hash
executor node and the other is about
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:16:07PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
Would you also be able to mention something about f15821e and d222585 ?
I am going to defer to Tom on that. I have added optimizer changes in
the past but he didn't feel it made sense unless
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Improve hash creation and lookup performance (Tomas Vondra,
Teodor Sigaev, Tom Lane, Robert Haas)
I suggest haveing two separate items. One of those is about the Hash
executor
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:13:26PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Improve hash creation and lookup performance (Tomas Vondra,
Teodor
On 06/10/2015 09:50 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
Also shall we mention about below in Migrations to 9.5 section
pg_basebackup will not not work in tar mode against 9.4 and older servers,
as we have introduced a new protocol option in that mode.
AFAIK, pg_basebackup has never worked across
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 06/10/2015 09:50 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
Also shall we mention about below in Migrations to 9.5 section
pg_basebackup will not not work in tar mode against 9.4 and older
servers,
as we have introduced a new
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:16:07PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
On 11 June 2015 at 16:15, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 02:16:59PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Hi,
On 06/11/15 06:15, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
and it will eventually appear
On 2015-06-11 PM 01:15, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
and it will eventually appear here:
On 11 June 2015 at 16:15, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
Thanks Bruce.
Would you also be able to mention something about f15821e and
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
Thanks for writing the Release notes.
Some comments:
Have pg_basebackup
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
the output here:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
and it will eventually appear here:
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
In any case, third party foreign data wrappers that target other
database system will totally ignore ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING when built
against the master branch (unless they consider these questions). They
should perhaps make a point of rejecting DO NOTHING outright
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
