"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Almost there, but you didn't pick up my regression test patches :-(
> Fixed ...
Ok, the re-re-wrap looks good AFAICS.
> Now, what about Robert/Chris' comments about the potential changes in
> error messages
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Devrim/David ... I'm doing a force sync of the ftp site from developer ->
> ftp right now, so all the bundles should be there for you ... the SRPMs
> are done for 7.4.5, are you going to do similiar with the 7.2.5 and 7.3.7
> distros?
Are 7.
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about people who are parsing the error messages?
Does anyone really have an application that is looking specifically for
"parse error"? And is going to do something useful when it finds it
that it would not do with an unrecognized error m
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Done, and done ... sizes look alot better now:
Almost there, but you didn't pick up my regression test patches :-(
Fixed ...
Also, I still see these in the top directory of the full tarfile:
-rw-r--r-- 1 tgl
If you want to proceed, let me know and I'll commit the updated
regression outputs into the 7.2 branch, and then we can re-wrap.
Let's go with the updated regression outputs ... probably better then
going and reverting down flex/bison just for packaging :(
What about people who are parsing the er
On Thursday 19 August 2004 16:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Let's go with the updated regression outputs ... probably better then
> > going and reverting down flex/bison just for packaging :(
>
> That's what I thought too. Patches committed --- rewrap whe
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Done, and done ... sizes look alot better now:
Almost there, but you didn't pick up my regression test patches :-(
Also, I still see these in the top directory of the full tarfile:
-rw-r--r-- 1 tglusers 70 Aug 19 19:47
postgre
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
'k, I'm blind ... build scripts for both 7.2 and 7.3 are identical, except
for which man.tar.gz it pulls in, and what directories in ftp they get
written to ...
Oh, I see the problem. In doc/Makefile, recent versio
Tom Lane wrote:
> Oh, I see the problem. In doc/Makefile, recent versions pass the
> "make distclean" operation down to doc/src, but 7.2's doesn't.
> Peter, any idea why it was like that back then?
The doc tree isn't built by default, so I guess no one had ever thought
of cleaning it by default
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> there, this one looks *much* better ... a couple of k smaller still:
The 7.3.7 tarball looks good to me too. 2 down, 1 to go ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TI
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 'k, I'm blind ... build scripts for both 7.2 and 7.3 are identical, except
> for which man.tar.gz it pulls in, and what directories in ftp they get
> written to ...
Oh, I see the problem. In doc/Makefile, recent versions pass the "make
distclean"
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The section for docs is:
> cd doc/src
> gmake postgres.tar.gz
> mv postgres.tar.gz ..
> cp /var/spool/ftp/pub/dev/doc/man-7.3.tar.gz ../man.tar.gz
> cd ../..
> gmake split-dist=yes dist
> gmake maintainer-clean
Shouldn't there be a "gmake clean" in
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Let's go with the updated regression outputs ... probably better then
> going and reverting down flex/bison just for packaging :(
That's what I thought too. Patches committed --- rewrap whenever you
have a chance.
regards,
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I just got 7.2.5 done now ... I pulled the man.tar.gz file from 7.2.4 and
put a copy of it into ~ftp/pub/dev/doc/man-7.2.tar.gz (in case its needed
in the future) ...
The 7.2.5 tarball is considerably bigger than 7.
there, this one looks *much* better ... a couple of k smaller still:
%ls -lt postgresql-7.3.7.tar.gz ../v7.3.6/postgresql-7.3.6.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 pgsql pgsql 11284024 Aug 19 16:27 postgresql-7.3.7.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 pgsql pgsql 11288430 Mar 4 21:35 ../v7.3.6/postgresql-7.3.6.tar.gz
On Th
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I never got any feedback on v7.3.7's packaging, so I'm guessing that it
looked okay to everyone, even though it was substantially smaller?
I diff'd the 7.3.6 and 7.3.7 tarballs, and got these unexpected
differences:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
One other little problem with the 7.2.5 package: I see you rebuilt the
flex and bison output files with our current versions of those tools.
I think this is probably okay, but it changes the expected output of
some of the regression tests, eg
*** ./expected/stri
I've just done a re-export of teh CVS for 7.3.7 ... this time,
earthdistance appears to be in there properly ... not sure what happened,
but am building a new package for it, and will check sizes again when
finished ...
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The good news is that the 7.4.5 package looks right ;-)
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
One other little problem with the 7.2.5 package: I see you rebuilt the
flex and bison output files with our current versions of those tools.
I think this is probably okay, but it changes the expected output of
some of the regression tests, eg
*** ./expected/strings.out Fri Jun 1 13:49:17 200
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I never got any feedback on v7.3.7's packaging, so I'm guessing that it
> looked okay to everyone, even though it was substantially smaller?
I diff'd the 7.3.6 and 7.3.7 tarballs, and got these unexpected
differences:
Only in postgresql-7.3.6/cont
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just got 7.2.5 done now ... I pulled the man.tar.gz file from 7.2.4 and
> put a copy of it into ~ftp/pub/dev/doc/man-7.2.tar.gz (in case its needed
> in the future) ...
The 7.2.5 tarball is considerably bigger than 7.2.4; this seems to be
becaus
Nope, and I even checked jdbc to make sure nothing go screwed up with the
moves post-7.3, and its there also ... and 7.2 *appears* to be okay size
wise ...
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I never got any feedback on v7.3.7's packaging, so I'm g
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I never got any feedback on v7.3.7's packaging, so I'm guessing that it
> looked okay to everyone, even though it was substantially smaller?
Devrim pointed out yesterday that it seemed to be missing
contrib/earthdistance; that's not enough to expla
24 matches
Mail list logo
