On 03/31/2015 09:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 03/31/2015 10:51 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-03-31 10:49:06 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 03/31/2015 04:20 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Perhaps we could consider it after a year or two, once 9.4 is indeed
very stable, but at that
On 03/30/2015 09:57 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
We have a database that has run into this problem. The version is 9.1.15 on
Linux. I note in this thread:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com
wrote:
Perhaps we could consider it after a year or two, once 9.4 is indeed
very stable, but at that point you have to wonder if it's really worth
the trouble anymore. If someone
On 03/31/2015 10:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Perhaps we could consider it after a year or two, once 9.4 is indeed
very stable, but at that point you have to wonder if it's really worth
the trouble anymore. If someone
On 03/31/2015 10:51 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-03-31 10:49:06 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 03/31/2015 04:20 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Perhaps we could consider it after a year or two, once 9.4 is indeed
very stable, but at that point you have to wonder if it's really worth
the
On 03/31/2015 04:20 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
I believe that Heikki said he'd backpatch that when 9.4 was considered
very stable. I don't think that we've reached that level of confidence
in the invasive B-Tree bugfixes that went into 9.4 yet.
I have no intention to backpatch the
On 03/31/2015 04:20 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 03/30/2015 09:57 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Joshua D. Drake
j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
We have a database that has run into this problem. The version is
9.1.15 on
Linux. I note in this thread:
On 03/31/2015 11:05 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I have no intention to backpatch the changes. Too big, too invasive.
Perhaps we could consider it after a year or two, once 9.4 is indeed
very stable, but at that point you have to wonder if it's really worth
the trouble anymore. If someone has runs
On 2015-03-31 10:49:06 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 03/31/2015 04:20 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Perhaps we could consider it after a year or two, once 9.4 is indeed
very stable, but at that point you have to wonder if it's really worth
the trouble anymore. If someone has runs into that
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Perhaps we could consider it after a year or two, once 9.4 is indeed
very stable, but at that point you have to wonder if it's really worth
the trouble anymore. If someone has runs into that issue frequently, he
10 matches
Mail list logo
