Robert Haas writes:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
- Writeable CTEs - I think we need Tom to pick this one up.
- Fix snapshot taking
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> - Writeable CTEs - I think we need Tom to pick this one up.
> - Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies - R
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
- Writeable CTEs - I think we need Tom to pick this one up.
- Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies - Ready for committer. Can any
committer pick this up?
>
>
Robert Haas writes:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> - Writeable CTEs - I think we need Tom to pick this one up.
>>> - Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies - Ready for committer. Can any
>>> committer pick this up?
>> Will take a look at these two also.
> Tom, what is your
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> - Writeable CTEs - I think we need Tom to pick this one up.
>>> - Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies - Ready for committer. Can any
>>> committer pick this up?
>
> Will take a look at these two also.
Tom, what is your time frame on this? I t
Tom Lane wrote:
- Writeable CTEs - I think we need Tom to pick this one up.
- Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies - Ready for committer. Can any
committer pick this up?
Will take a look at these two also.
I marked you down at the listed committer for them both. That leaves
"serial
Robert Haas writes:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> - fix for seg picksplit function - I don't have confidence this change
>> is for the best and can't take responsibility for it. It needs review
>> by a committer who understands this stuff better than me and can
>> det
On Dec15, 2010, at 17:17 , Robert Haas wrote:
> Nah, don't bother reposting. It'd be helpful if you could add a link
> to that message on the CF app though.
Already done. Seems we've hit a race condition there - you must have overlooked
the signalling the semaphore on my rooftop did to warn you
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Florian Pflug wrote:
> On Dec15, 2010, at 16:45 , Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Florian Pflug wrote:
>>> On Dec14, 2010, at 15:01 , Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Florian Pflug wrote:
>> - serializable lock
On Dec15, 2010, at 16:45 , Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Florian Pflug wrote:
>> On Dec14, 2010, at 15:01 , Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Florian Pflug wrote:
> - serializable lock consistency - I am fairly certain this needs
> rebasing.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Florian Pflug wrote:
> On Dec14, 2010, at 15:01 , Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Florian Pflug wrote:
- serializable lock consistency - I am fairly certain this needs
rebasing. I don't have time to deal with it right away. That
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> - fix for seg picksplit function - I don't have confidence this change
> is for the best and can't take responsibility for it. It needs review
> by a committer who understands this stuff better than me and can
> determine whether or not the c
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Florian Pflug wrote:
>> - serializable lock consistency - I am fairly certain this needs
>> rebasing. I don't have time to deal with it right away. That sucks,
>> because I think this is a really important change.
> I can try to find some time to update the patch
On Dec13, 2010, at 18:37 , Robert Haas wrote:
> We're now just a day or two from the end of this CommitFest and there
> are still a LOT of open patches - to be specific, 23.Here's a brief
> synopsis of where we are with the others, all IMO of course.
Thanks for putting this together!
> - serializa
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 12/13/10 9:37 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> - synchronous replication - and...
>> - synchronous replication, transaction-controlled - If we want to get
>> this feature into 9.1, we had better get a move on. But I don't
>> currently have it in m
Robert Haas wrote:
- instrument checkpoint sync calls - I plan to commit this in the next
48 hours. (Hopefully Greg Smith will do the cleanup I suggested, if
not I'll do it.)
Yes, doing that tonight so you can have a simple (hopefully) bit of work
to commit tomorrow.
- MERGE command - R
On 12/13/10 9:37 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> - synchronous replication - and...
> - synchronous replication, transaction-controlled - If we want to get
> this feature into 9.1, we had better get a move on. But I don't
> currently have it in my time budget to deal with this.
I thought we'd covered mo
"David E. Wheeler" writes:
> On Dec 13, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> So, who's in to finish up and commit this patch in this round? :)
>
> I'll try to do another review this week.
Thanks!
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
On Dec 13, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> So, who's in to finish up and commit this patch in this round? :)
> I certainly am ready to support last minute changes, given some are
> required. And if they are too big for the schedule, better shake the
> patch out now rather than let it
Robert Haas writes:
> We're now just a day or two from the end of this CommitFest and there
> are still a LOT of open patches - to be specific, 23.Here's a brief
> synopsis of where we are with the others, all IMO of course.
Thanks for doing this!
> - Extensions - Still under active discussion,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:37:52PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> We're now just a day or two from the end of this CommitFest and there
>> are still a LOT of open patches - to be specific, 23.Here's a brief
>> synopsis of where we are with the o
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:37:52PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> We're now just a day or two from the end of this CommitFest and there
> are still a LOT of open patches - to be specific, 23.Here's a brief
> synopsis of where we are with the others, all IMO of course.
[snip]
> - Writeable CTEs - I th
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 12/13/2010 12:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> - SQL/MED - core functionality - Seems clear to move this to the next
>> CF and keep working on it.
>
> [...]
>>
>> - SQL/MED - file_fdw - Discussion is ongoing, but I see no harm in
>> m
On 12/13/2010 12:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
- SQL/MED - core functionality - Seems clear to move this to the next
CF and keep working on it.
[...]
- SQL/MED - file_fdw - Discussion is ongoing, but I see no harm in
marking this Returned with Feedback for now in anticipation of a new
version bef
24 matches
Mail list logo
