Re: [HACKERS] Configuration of statistical views

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not familiar with the kinds of statistics that are supposed to be > gathered here, but I suppose their usefulness would be greatly increased > if they were gathered across all data/actions, not only the ones that the > users turned them on for. S

Re: [HACKERS] Configuration of statistical views

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> backend start/stop events probably need to be reported whenever the >> postmaster variable is set, even if all the USERSET variables are off. > I don't consider backend start/stop messages to be critical, > although we get some complaints alrea

Re: [HACKERS] Configuration of statistical views

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If somebody wants to see an applications querystring (at >> least the first 512 bytes) just in case something goes wrong >> and the client hangs, he'd have to run querystring reporting >> all the time either way. > Agreed. That should be on all

Re: [HACKERS] Configuration of statistical views

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So I can see value in a per database default in pg_database > plus the ability to switch it on/off via statement to analyze > single commands. Do you even need a per-database default? Why not an installation-wide default in postgresql.conf pl