Sorry to keep replying to myself, but part of the point of doing a
patch was to force myself (and whoever else is interested to examine
stuff that comes up...
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Tom Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> None of that suggests that an uninstaller script would be needed
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Tom Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:59 AM, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wonder if there's much of a use case for any statements aside from
> CREATE
> > statements. If we restrict it to CREATE statements we could h
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:59 AM, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if there's much of a use case for any statements aside from CREATE
> statements. If we restrict it to CREATE statements we could hack things to
> create pg_depend entries automatically. In which case we wouldn't
"Tom Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - I'd like to add pg_depend entries for stuff installed by the module
> on the pd_module entry, so that you can't drop stuff required by the
> module without uninstalling the module itself. There would have to be
> either a function or more syntax to al
