On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> [blah]
> What I did about this was to leave the behavior alone in back branches,
> but insist on a type match in HEAD. I think we can reasonably tighten
> the type requirements in a new major release, but doing it in minor
> releases is probably
Michael Paquier writes:
> So, I have been poking at this code a bit more and as the values of
> the parameters are passed as-is to the SQL queries that connectby
> generates internally (this is as well mentioned in the documentation
> here: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/tablefunc.htm
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> Patch is attached. Comments welcome.
So, I have been poking at this code a bit more and as the values of
the parameters are passed as-is to the SQL queries that connectby
generates internally (this is as well mentioned in the documentation
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 01/19/2015 08:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Haven't look
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 01/19/2015 08:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Haven't looked at this patch, but I wonder if it would be better
>>> to replace
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/19/2015 08:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Haven't looked at this patch, but I wonder if it would be better
>> to replace the innards of connectby with a rewrite of the query to
>> use s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2015 08:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Haven't looked at this patch, but I wonder if it would be better
> to replace the innards of connectby with a rewrite of the query to
> use standard WITH queries. Maybe we can remove a couple hundred
> l
Haven't looked at this patch, but I wonder if it would be better to
replace the innards of connectby with a rewrite of the query to use
standard WITH queries. Maybe we can remove a couple hundred lines from
tablefunc.c?
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Deve
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> As mentioned in $subject, commit 08c33c4 of 2003 has made the
>> following block of code dead in tablefunc.c:1320 because level is
>> incremented to at least 1:
>> /* First time through, do a little more setup */
>>
Michael Paquier wrote:
> As mentioned in $subject, commit 08c33c4 of 2003 has made the
> following block of code dead in tablefunc.c:1320 because level is
> incremented to at least 1:
> /* First time through, do a little more setup */
> if (level == 0)
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
