Re: [HACKERS] Fixing target-column indirection in INSERT with multiple VALUES

2016-07-27 Thread Tom Lane
Kevin Grittner writes: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> this would require an initdb because it changes the >> representation of stored rules for cases like this, > So pg_upgrade would not work at all for the version this goes into, No, pg_upgrade wouldn't have a problem.

Re: [HACKERS] Fixing target-column indirection in INSERT with multiple VALUES

2016-07-27 Thread Kevin Grittner
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I looked into the problem reported in bug #14265, > attached is a proposed patch that fixes this bug > this would require an initdb because it changes the > representation of stored rules for cases like this, So pg_upgrade would not work at al