Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone explain why we have a lisp.sgml file in our docs? Seems it
> descripes a 3rd party Emacs interface. I don't think we should start
> distributing docs for software we don't distribute. Can I remove it?
Only if you move the pointer to somep
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This must have been an artifact from the time when part of the Postgres
> system was written in Lisp. A Lisp procedural language never actually
> existed in PostgreSQL.
[ Digs in archives... ] The pg_language entry that Vladimir refers to
was still
Vladimir V. Zolotych writes:
> I see the following
>
> proba=> select * from pg_language;
> lanname |lanispl|lanpltrusted|lanplcallfoid|lancompiler
> +---++-+--
> internal|f |f |0|n/a
> lisp|f |f |
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 04:54:07PM +0300, Vladimir V. Zolotych wrote:
> I see the following
>
> proba=> select * from pg_language;
> lisp|f |f |0|/usr/ucb/liszt
> Would you mind to tell me is it possible to use Lisp
> as procedural language ? Which Lisp (e.g Emac
