>
>
>All the delay seems to be in transferring the message from
>postgresql.org to webmail.postgresql.org ... which are the same
>machine, or at least the same IP address. What's up with that?
>
Looks like sendmail? Change your queue runs to be more aggressive. I
have an mc file on http://blu
> > Actually, the 'multi-day' delay is generally related to posts from ppl
> > that aren't subscribed to the lists that I have to approve manually ...
>
> I have been getting delayed duplicates from people (ie, Tom Lane)
addressed
> to only the hackers list (which I know he's subscribed to). Up t
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2001 19:45, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> Actually, the 'multi-day' delay is generally related to posts from ppl
>> that aren't subscribed to the lists that I have to approve manually ...
> I have been getting delayed duplicates from peop
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 19:45, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Actually, the 'multi-day' delay is generally related to posts from ppl
> that aren't subscribed to the lists that I have to approve manually ...
I have been getting delayed duplicates from people (ie, Tom Lane) addressed
to only the hack
If it was a sendmail issue, by all means, but it isn't so no :)
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >
> > Nope, but thanks for the offer ;)
>
> Pleeeze?
>
> You won't be sorry
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Nope, but thanks for the offer ;)
Pleeeze?
You won't be sorry or disappointed!!
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Aug 20
Nope, but thanks for the offer ;)
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday 21 August 2001 12:59, Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> > > > Looking at my message about the bug webpage and
> >
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 21 August 2001 12:59, Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> > > Looking at my message about the bug webpage and
> > > some other posts, I see that it was delayed for
> > > about 2h and a half. Some of the pos
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Huh? Two different machines altogether ...
Hmm. Maybe the problem is this:
$ nslookup -q=mx postgresql.org
Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
Non-authoritative answer:
postgresql.org preference = 0, mail exchanger = mail.postgresql.org
pos
Huh? Two different machines altogether ... but, I do have work to do once
the new server goes online ...
> nslookup postgresql.org
Server: localhost.hub.org
Address: 127.0.0.1
Name:postgresql.org
Address: 216.126.84.28
> nslookup webmail.postgresql.org
Server: localhost.hub.org
Addres
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2001 12:59, Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> > Looking at my message about the bug webpage and
> > some other posts, I see that it was delayed for
> > about 2h and a half. Some of the post were
> > delayed for days... Why is that? Looks like
>
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The best thing to do is simply to expect propagation delay.
Actually, I just sent a gripe off to Marc about this. I've been
noticing large and variable propagation delay for a few months now,
but I just today realized that the problem is entirely local to
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 12:59, Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> Looking at my message about the bug webpage and
> some other posts, I see that it was delayed for
> about 2h and a half. Some of the post were
> delayed for days... Why is that? Looks like
> the list has problems of some sort which cause
> t
13 matches
Mail list logo
