Robert Haas writes:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not sure that we have any non-relation objects that are both complex
>> enough and changeable enough for there to be an observable bug here,
>> but it seems like a risk factor going forward. It seems to me both safe
>>
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> It seems suspicious to me that LockSharedObject() calls
>> AcceptInvalidationMessges() and LockDatabaseObject() does not. Since
>> the only caller of LockSharedObject() at present is
>> AcquireDeletionLock(), I'm not sure
Robert Haas writes:
> It seems suspicious to me that LockSharedObject() calls
> AcceptInvalidationMessges() and LockDatabaseObject() does not. Since
> the only caller of LockSharedObject() at present is
> AcquireDeletionLock(), I'm not sure there's an observable bug here at
> the moment, but then
