Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-07-01 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote: It is? When did that happen? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-04/msg00111.php Thanks. Change added to the wiki. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscri

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-07-01 Thread Tom Lane
"David E. Wheeler" writes: > On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> The FAQ is on the wiki now ... fix it yourself. > It is? When did that happen? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-04/msg00111.php regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers m

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-07-01 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:15 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Just a reminder, Bruce, to add the CITEXT bit to the FAQ when 8.4 is > >> released. Is that supposed to be today? > > > > The FAQ is on the wiki now ... fix it yourself. > > It is? When

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-07-01 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Just a reminder, Bruce, to add the CITEXT bit to the FAQ when 8.4 is released. Is that supposed to be today? The FAQ is on the wiki now ... fix it yourself. It is? When did that happen? Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-h

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-07-01 Thread Tom Lane
"David E. Wheeler" writes: > Just a reminder, Bruce, to add the CITEXT bit to the FAQ when 8.4 is > released. Is that supposed to be today? The FAQ is on the wiki now ... fix it yourself. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgres

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-07-01 Thread David E . Wheeler
On Feb 6, 2009, at 10:54 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote: On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Oh. That seems kind of odd?can you hang onto the patch until 8.4 is released, then? This must happen all the time, no? OK, I will hang on to it, but I will have to mention it is only in 8.

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-02-06 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Oh. That seems kind of odd?can you hang onto the patch until 8.4 is released, then? This must happen all the time, no? OK, I will hang on to it, but I will have to mention it is only in 8.4 too. Ah, yeah, I didn't put that in the patch… Thank

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-02-06 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Quick patch to mention CITEXT in the parts of the FAQ that discuss case-insensitive comparisons. I think it is too early to mention /contrib/citext in the FAQ because 8.4 is not released yet. Oh, is the FAQ on the site built from CVS tip? Is t

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-02-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >> Oh, is the FAQ on the site built from CVS tip? Is there not a branch > >> for 8.3 from which it's built? > > > > There are FAQ's in each branch, but the one that is put on the web > > site > > is from CVS HEAD. >

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-02-06 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Quick patch to mention CITEXT in the parts of the FAQ that discuss case-insensitive comparisons. I think it is too early to mention /contrib/citext in the FAQ because 8.4 is not released yet. Oh, is the FAQ on the site built from CVS tip? Is t

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-02-06 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Oh, is the FAQ on the site built from CVS tip? Is there not a branch for 8.3 from which it's built? There are FAQ's in each branch, but the one that is put on the web site is from CVS HEAD. Oh. That seems kind of odd…can you hang onto the p

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-02-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >> Quick patch to mention CITEXT in the parts of the FAQ that discuss > >> case-insensitive comparisons. > > > > I think it is too early to mention /contrib/citext in the FAQ because > > 8.4 is not released yet. > > Oh

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-02-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
David E. Wheeler wrote: > Quick patch to mention CITEXT in the parts of the FAQ that discuss > case-insensitive comparisons. I think it is too early to mention /contrib/citext in the FAQ because 8.4 is not released yet. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB

Re: [HACKERS] Mention CITEXT in the FAQ

2009-01-08 Thread David E. Wheeler
Bah, sorry for the duplication! David On Jan 8, 2009, at 11:00 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote: Quick patch to mention CITEXT in the parts of the FAQ that discuss case-insensitive comparisons. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes