On 15 February 2011 21:47, Tom Lane wrote:
> Also, so far as I can see array_cat *is* ||, so I'm not sure what
> discrepancy in behavior you're on about.
You've confused me now. I had a case where I replaced || with , and
surrounded it with array_cat, and the result differed, and now I can't
rec
On 15 February 2011 21:46, Cédric Villemain
wrote:
> 2011/2/15 Thom Brown :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I assumed array_cat would behave similarly to array || array, but it
>> appears not when it comes to NULLs. Shouldn't these have identical
>> functionality? The attached patch makes it so, although it wo
Thom Brown writes:
> I assumed array_cat would behave similarly to array || array, but it
> appears not when it comes to NULLs. Shouldn't these have identical
> functionality? The attached patch makes it so, although it would
> break existing code.
That patch is the hard way: the right change w
2011/2/15 Thom Brown :
> Hi all,
>
> I assumed array_cat would behave similarly to array || array, but it
> appears not when it comes to NULLs. Shouldn't these have identical
> functionality? The attached patch makes it so, although it would
> break existing code.
There is bugreport and todo ent
