[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Davis) writes:
> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 22:12 -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
>
>> > Can you elaborate a little? Which filesystems have been problematic?
>> > Which filesystems are you more confident in?
>>
>> Well, more or less *all* of them, on AMD-64/Linux.
>>
>> The "p
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 22:12 -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> > Can you elaborate a little? Which filesystems have been problematic?
> > Which filesystems are you more confident in?
>
> Well, more or less *all* of them, on AMD-64/Linux.
>
> The "pulling the fibrechannel cable" test blew them al
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Davis) wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 18:55 -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Davis) writes:
>> >> > Do you see an advantage in using LFS for PostgreSQL?
>> >>
>> >> Hey guys - I think the original poster only meant to suggest that it
>> >> was *interest
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 18:55 -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Davis) writes:
> >> > Do you see an advantage in using LFS for PostgreSQL?
> >>
> >> Hey guys - I think the original poster only meant to suggest that it
> >> was *interesting*... :-)
> >>
> >
> > I see, my mistake.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Davis) writes:
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 23:28 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 05:54:50PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 18:24 -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
>> > > Recently seen in ACM Operating Systems Review (this is the first tim
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 23:28 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 05:54:50PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 18:24 -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> > > Recently seen in ACM Operating Systems Review (this is the first time
> > > I've found as many as 1 interesting
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 05:54:50PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 18:24 -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> > Recently seen in ACM Operating Systems Review (this is the first time
> > I've found as many as 1 interesting article in it in a while, and
> > there were 3 things I found worthw
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 18:24 -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> Recently seen in ACM Operating Systems Review (this is the first time
> I've found as many as 1 interesting article in it in a while, and
> there were 3 things I found worthwhile...):
>
> NTT (of the recent "NTT Power Hour") have created a n
Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> NetBSD used to have a LFS; has that gone anywhere? Or been
> essentially dropped?
My reading over the last few years has indicated that LFSs tend to
suffer bad performance degradation as data and metadata for a given
file get scattered all over the disk
