On 13-01-07 09:58 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
By implementing a str handler for the result object, it now prints
something like
PLyResult status=5 nrows=2 rows=[{'foo': 1, 'bar': '11'}, {'foo': 2, 'bar':
'22'}]
Patch attached for review.
Here is a review:
This patch adds a function that
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 15:43 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
I've looked through the code and everything looks fine.
The patch includes no documentation. Adding a few lines to the
Utility Functions section of the plpython documentation so people know
about this feature would be good.
Added
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
For debugging PL/Python functions, I'm often tempted to write something
like
rv = plpy.execute(...)
plpy.info(rv)
which prints something unhelpful like
PLyResult object at 0xb461d8d8
By implementing a str handler
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
For debugging PL/Python functions, I'm often tempted to write something
like
rv = plpy.execute(...)
plpy.info(rv)
which prints something
On 1/8/13 4:32 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
How does it work if there are many rows in there? Say the result
contains 10,000 rows - will the string contain all of them? If so,
might it be worthwhile to cap the number of rows shown and then follow
with a ... or something?
I don't think so. Any
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On 1/8/13 4:32 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
How does it work if there are many rows in there? Say the result
contains 10,000 rows - will the string contain all of them? If so,
might it be worthwhile to cap the number of
On 1/8/13 11:55 AM, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
PLyResult status=5 nrows=2 rows=[{'foo': 1, 'bar': '11'}, {'foo': 2,
'bar': '22'}]
This looks more a repr-style format to me (if you implement repr but
not str, the latter will default to the former).
The repr style was the only guideline I found.
