Re: [HACKERS] Patch rev 2: MySQL-ism help patch for psql

2010-01-20 Thread Rob Wultsch
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:01 PM, David Christensen wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:14 PM, David E. Wheeler >> wrote: >>> >>> Why would they want more? It's not MySQL, and they know that. If we give >>> them some very minor helpful hints fo

Re: [HACKERS] Patch rev 2: MySQL-ism help patch for psql

2010-01-19 Thread Tom Lane
David Christensen writes: > I also forgot to enclose the sample output in this version, based > largely on Tom's wording for the USE usecase: Please note that that was just an off-the-cuff example, not something I thought was perfect as is ... regards, tom lane -- Sen

Re: [HACKERS] Patch rev 2: MySQL-ism help patch for psql

2010-01-19 Thread David Christensen
On Jan 19, 2010, at 6:01 PM, David Christensen wrote: On Jan 19, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:14 PM, David E. Wheeler > wrote: Why would they want more? It's not MySQL, and they know that. If we give them some very minor helpful hints for the most common