On 3 March 2011 06:33, Andy Colson wrote:
> On 1/23/2011 5:11 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
>> As I already said when the script was introduced, I would love to have a
>> real
>> perl solution, but I'm not a perl programmer by any means.
>>
>> Michael
>
> I thought Kris was going to work on this, but
On 3/3/2011 6:49 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:33:35PM -0600, Andy Colson wrote:
I thought Kris was going to work on this, but saw no progress, and I
was bored the other day, so I started working on it.
Here is a parse.pl, with some major refactoring.
I named it with a 2
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:33:35PM -0600, Andy Colson wrote:
> I thought Kris was going to work on this, but saw no progress, and I
> was bored the other day, so I started working on it.
>
> Here is a parse.pl, with some major refactoring.
>
> I named it with a 2 so I could run it beside the orig
Andy Colson writes:
> Here is a parse.pl, with some major refactoring.
> I am sure there are new bugs. I have not run it on anything but 9.0.1.
> Are there other .y files you might feed it? (something other than
> backend/parser/gram.y?)
That's the only file it has to work for. You could t
On 1/23/2011 5:11 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 08:40:13PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I think these really need to be rewritten from scratch. They look
like they were written by someone who never heard of Perl 5 (it's
only about 16 years old).
You might remember that we h
On sön, 2011-01-23 at 12:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andy Colson writes:
> > Is there anyway to make bison/yacc/gcc/etc spit out the rule names?
>
> bison -v produces a debug output file that includes nicely cleaned-up
> versions of all the rules. But it includes a lot of other stuff too,
> and
On 23 January 2011 14:28, Kris Shannon wrote:
> On 23 January 2011 13:14, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> But there are quite a few perlheads around. ISTR Matt Trout was muttering
>> about these scripts on IRC recently.
>
> A quick cleanup of the check_rules.pl...
>
> It's a starting point at least.
>
On 24 January 2011 03:06, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It's doing the right thing. But it's really spaghetti code, generated by
> a2p. Matt was just (rightly) offended by the $[ setting, IIRC.
>
> The point is that it's close to being totally unmaintainable.
>
> But if you think you can remedy it witho
Kris Shannon writes:
> What is the minimal perl version that we are requiring these days?
5.8 according to configure.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/
Andy Colson writes:
> Is there anyway to make bison/yacc/gcc/etc spit out the rule names?
bison -v produces a debug output file that includes nicely cleaned-up
versions of all the rules. But it includes a lot of other stuff too,
and I'm not at all sure that the file format is stable across bison
On 01/23/2011 10:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 01/23/2011 10:16 AM, Andy Colson wrote:
On 01/23/2011 08:29 AM, Andy Colson wrote:
On 01/22/2011 09:28 PM, k...@shannon.id.au wrote:
On 23 January 2011 13:14, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
But there are quite a few perlheads around. ISTR Matt Trout w
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 09:16:33AM -0600, Andy Colson wrote:
> Are there other problems with this script? Does it not pull out the rule
> names correct all the time or something? What problem was Matt having with
> it?
No, afaict it works correctly but throws some warnings.
Michael
--
Michae
On 01/23/2011 10:16 AM, Andy Colson wrote:
On 01/23/2011 08:29 AM, Andy Colson wrote:
On 01/22/2011 09:28 PM, k...@shannon.id.au wrote:
On 23 January 2011 13:14, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
But there are quite a few perlheads around. ISTR Matt Trout was
muttering
about these scripts on IRC recent
On 01/23/2011 08:29 AM, Andy Colson wrote:
On 01/22/2011 09:28 PM, k...@shannon.id.au wrote:
On 23 January 2011 13:14, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
But there are quite a few perlheads around. ISTR Matt Trout was muttering
about these scripts on IRC recently.
Ok, so I've figured out what its purpose
On 01/23/2011 06:11 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 08:40:13PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I think these really need to be rewritten from scratch. They look
like they were written by someone who never heard of Perl 5 (it's
only about 16 years old).
You might remember that w
On 01/22/2011 09:28 PM, k...@shannon.id.au wrote:
On 23 January 2011 13:14, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
But there are quite a few perlheads around. ISTR Matt Trout was muttering
about these scripts on IRC recently.
A quick cleanup of the check_rules.pl...
It's a starting point at least.
Oh!
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 08:40:13PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I think these really need to be rewritten from scratch. They look
> like they were written by someone who never heard of Perl 5 (it's
> only about 16 years old).
You might remember that we had this discussion before. The script was
On 23 January 2011 13:14, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> But there are quite a few perlheads around. ISTR Matt Trout was muttering
> about these scripts on IRC recently.
A quick cleanup of the check_rules.pl...
It's a starting point at least.
ecpg_prepoc_check_rules_cleanup.patch
Description: Binary
On 01/22/2011 08:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
On 01/22/2011 06:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
On Fedora 14 I see these warnings while building ecpg's preproc.y:
Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at ./parse.pl line 21.
Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at ./check_rules.pl li
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 01/22/2011 06:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> On Fedora 14 I see these warnings while building ecpg's preproc.y:
>>
>> Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at ./parse.pl line 21.
>> Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at ./check_rules.pl line 18.
>>
>> Any Perl experts w
On 01/22/2011 06:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
On Fedora 14 I see these warnings while building ecpg's preproc.y:
Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at ./parse.pl line 21.
Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at ./check_rules.pl line 18.
Any Perl experts want to make those go away?
21 matches
Mail list logo
