On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 15:52, mlw wrote:
> Dale Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Hello Group,
> >I need your help, in putting together a list of comparisons, and good solid
>technical reasons, to why to use PostgreSQL over using Microsoft SQL Server. Right
>now, we are using PostgreSQL for a back-en
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 15:52, mlw wrote:
> > Dale Anderson wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Group,
> > >I need your help, in putting together a list of comparisons, and good solid
>technical reasons, to why to use PostgreSQL over using Microsoft SQL Ser
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 15:52, mlw wrote:
> Dale Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Hello Group,
> >I need your help, in putting together a list of comparisons, and
good solid technical reasons, to why to use PostgreSQL over using
Microsoft SQL Server. Right now, we are using PostgreSQL for a back-end
fo
Dale Anderson wrote:
>
> Hello Group,
>I need your help, in putting together a list of comparisons, and good solid
>technical reasons, to why to use PostgreSQL over using Microsoft SQL Server. Right
>now, we are using PostgreSQL for a back-end for some of our web stuff. A couple of
>our
Le Lundi 18 Mars 2002 22:53, Dale Anderson a écrit :
> A couple of our developers, which are Microsoft VB developers, are
> complaining about not being able to use proprietary MS stuff with
> PostgreSQL.
Dear Dale,
Maybe you could consider using pgAdmin2 (http://pgadmin.postgresql.org),
which d
"Dale Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Group,
[snip: why would PG be "better" than MSSQL?]
"Better" isn't meaningful except in the context of the problem you're
trying to solve. There will be some problems where PG is right, some
where MSSQL works better, and some where neither is
