This has been saved for the 7.4 release:
http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
I will not apply the _inline_ part.
---
Billy G. Allie wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> I am including a set of 4 sma
Billy, so your rpath changes are for handling customization you made to
your OS. Sounds like a feature addition to me, which will go into 7.4
only.
---
Billy G. Allie wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I don't believe your changes are necessary.
> >
> > The static-inline change was obsoleted by a recent fix, per discussion.
> > But the rpath changes seem possibly useful (or maybe my tho
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> We already have success messages from Olivier Prenant for 7.3B4 on 8.0.0,
> and me for 7.1.3.
>
> I don't believe your changes are necessary.
>
Was that using gcc or the native compiler?
Was it in linux kernel personality mode or OpenUNIX mode.
I was compiling using the
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am fine with this because it only touches unixware-specific stuff,
> > except the change to Tom's inline function:
> > [static] inline Datum
> > myFunctionCall2(FmgrInfo *flinfo, Datum arg1, Datum arg2)
> > Tom will have to comme
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Billy G. Allie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here is the error messages generated during the compile:
>
> > cc -K pentium_pro,host,inline,loop_unroll -I../../../../src/include
> > -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include -c -o tuplesort.o tuplesort.
> c
> > UX:acomp: E
--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 02:42:47 -0500 Tom Lane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't believe your changes are necessary.
The static-inline change was obsoleted by a recent fix, per discussion.
But the rpath changes seem possibly useful (or ma
--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 01:17:55 -0500 "Billy G. Allie"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
We already have success messages from Olivier Prenant for 7.3B4 on
8.0.0, and me for 7.1.3.
I don't believe your changes are necessary.
Was that using gcc or the native compil
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't believe your changes are necessary.
The static-inline change was obsoleted by a recent fix, per discussion.
But the rpath changes seem possibly useful (or maybe my thoughts are
just colored by the fact that I'm currently trying to persuade OpenS
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Billy G. Allie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here is the error messages generated during the compile:
>
> > cc -K pentium_pro,host,inline,loop_unroll -I../../../../src/include
> > -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include -c -o tuplesort.o tuplesort.
> c
> > UX:acomp: E
"Billy G. Allie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is the error messages generated during the compile:
> cc -K pentium_pro,host,inline,loop_unroll -I../../../../src/include
> -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include -c -o tuplesort.o tuplesort.c
> UX:acomp: ERROR: "tuplesort.c", line 1854:
We already have success messages from Olivier Prenant for 7.3B4 on 8.0.0,
and me for 7.1.3.
I don't believe your changes are necessary.
--On Wednesday, November 06, 2002 22:57:26 -0500 "Billy G. Allie"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am including a set of 4 small patches that enable PostgreSQL
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am fine with this because it only touches unixware-specific stuff,
> except the change to Tom's inline function:
> [static] inline Datum
> myFunctionCall2(FmgrInfo *flinfo, Datum arg1, Datum arg2)
> Tom will have to comment on that.
That change wou
I am fine with this because it only touches unixware-specific stuff,
except the change to Tom's inline function:
[static] inline Datum
myFunctionCall2(FmgrInfo *flinfo, Datum arg1, Datum arg2)
Tom will have to comment on that.
14 matches
Mail list logo
