On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:40:26AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
What do you think about this idea?
+1, belatedly. Having inherent casts to/from text since version 8.3 has
smoothed out some aggravating corner cases. If the patch isn't invasive and the
casts are all explicit-only, I anticipate a
2011/10/11 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2011/10/11 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
What do you think about this idea?
It's a bad one.
Well, a ROW can contain
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
A current limits of dynamic work with row types in PL/pgSQL can be
decreased with a possible casts between rows and arrays. Now we have a
lot of tools for arrays, and these tools should be used for rows too.
2011/10/11 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
A current limits of dynamic work with row types in PL/pgSQL can be
decreased with a possible casts between rows and arrays. Now we have a
lot of tools for
sometimes he can use a numeric or int array, sometimes he have to
select text array. Target type is selected by user, and cast fail when
conversion is not possible.
using a some selected type (for array field) allows a processing in plpgsql.
motivation for this feature is simplification and
Hi,
2011-10-11 14:23 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Pavel Stehulepavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
A current limits of dynamic work with row types in PL/pgSQL can be
decreased with a possible casts between rows and arrays. Now we have a
lot of tools for
2011/10/11 Boszormenyi Zoltan z...@cybertec.at:
Hi,
2011-10-11 14:23 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Pavel Stehulepavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
A current limits of dynamic work with row types in PL/pgSQL can be
decreased with a possible casts
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
A current limits of dynamic work with row types in PL/pgSQL can be
decreased with a possible casts between rows and arrays. Now we have a
lot of tools for arrays, and these tools should be used for rows too.
2011/10/11 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
A current limits of dynamic work with row types in PL/pgSQL can be
decreased with a possible casts between rows and arrays. Now we have a
lot of tools for
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/11 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
A current limits of dynamic work with row types in PL/pgSQL can be
decreased with
2011/10/11 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/10/11 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
A current limits of dynamic work
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2011/10/11 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
What do you think about this idea?
It's a bad one.
Well, a ROW can contain values of different types; an ARRAY can't.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2011/10/11 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
What do you think about this idea?
It's a bad one.
13 matches
Mail list logo
