From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.
Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as
well, but I haven't looked at how much
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.
Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as
well, but I haven't looked at how much work that would be.
And to port the bu
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi.
>
> >>Am I misunderstanding it?
> >
> >That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no
> >longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead.
> >
> >Also, enable_thread_safety is now the d
Hi.
Am I misunderstanding it?
That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no
longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead.
Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for windows :-)
Ooops, Isn't pthreadGC2 necessary?
Slony-I is still used.
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:06:16PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi Magnus.
>
> configure was changed the cvs head.
> Is this what you intended it?_?
>
> I think necessary to recover it.
>
> *** configure.orig Tue Apr 3 17:51:06 2007
> --- configure Tue Apr 3 17:52:21 2007
> ***
