Re: [HACKERS] Remove ora2pg from contrib

2006-02-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Great, please remove it. Also, please mention the new URL so I can put it in the release notes. Thanks. --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Apparently, the development of ora2pg is going on at >

Re: [HACKERS] Remove ora2pg from contrib

2006-02-24 Thread Robert Treat
On Friday 24 February 2006 18:37, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus writes: > >> Please kill it already. This has been discussed and agreed upon a number > >> of times before, the last of which I even sent a quasi-patch to remove > >> this particular entry. > > > > Actually, there are 4-6 more project

Re: [HACKERS] Remove ora2pg from contrib

2006-02-24 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus writes: >> Please kill it already. This has been discussed and agreed upon a number >> of times before, the last of which I even sent a quasi-patch to remove >> this particular entry. > Actually, there are 4-6 more projects slated to get removed from contrib > per decision on this li

Re: [HACKERS] Remove ora2pg from contrib

2006-02-24 Thread Josh Berkus
Robert, > Please kill it already. This has been discussed and agreed upon a number > of times before, the last of which I even sent a quasi-patch to remove > this particular entry. Actually, there are 4-6 more projects slated to get removed from contrib per decision on this list; they're waiting

Re: [HACKERS] Remove ora2pg from contrib

2006-02-24 Thread Robert Treat
On Friday 24 February 2006 11:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Apparently, the development of ora2pg is going on at > , and quite actively so, rather than in > contrib, so I see no point in keeping it at the latter location except to > confuse people. License uniformi

Re: [HACKERS] Remove ora2pg from contrib

2006-02-24 Thread Jonah H. Harris
I think we should kill the contrib... I haven't personally seen anyone use it in a long time.  I've found that more and more people are using the Java ETL tools (which is kinda sad because ora2pg is pretty good). On 2/24/06, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Apparently, the development of