Re: [HACKERS] SQLSTATE for Hot Standby cancellation

2010-05-07 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 15:00 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 12:08 +0200, Yeb Havinga wrote: > > > That's funny because when I was reading this thread, I was thinking the > > exact opposite: having max_standby_delay always set to 0 so I know the > > standby server is as up-to-da

Re: [HACKERS] SQLSTATE for Hot Standby cancellation

2010-05-06 Thread Kevin Grittner
Simon Riggs wrote: > We don't have a retryable SQLSTATE, so perhaps we should document > that serialization_failure and deadlock_detected are both > retryable error conditions. As the above implies HS can throw some > errors that are non-retyable, so we use ERRCODE_ADMIN_SHUTDOWN. There is one