On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 01:16, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> >Assuming it's giving out correct information, there seems to be a lot of
> >evidence for dropping the default random_page_cost to 1...
> >
> >Chris
> >
> >
> Some time ago Joe Conway suggest a tool bas
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Assuming it's giving out correct information, there seems to be a lot of
> evidence for dropping the default random_page_cost to 1...
The fact that a lot of people are reporting numbers below 1 is
sufficient evidence that the script is broke
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>Assuming it's giving out correct information, there seems to be a lot of
>evidence for dropping the default random_page_cost to 1...
>
>Chris
>
>
Some time ago Joe Conway suggest a tool based on a genetic algorithm
which tries to find the best parameter settings
Assuming it's giving out correct information, there seems to be a lot of
evidence for dropping the default random_page_cost to 1...
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hans-Jürgen
> Schönig
> Sent: Monday, 9 September 2002 4:06 PM
