Re: [HACKERS] Walsender process patch v1 for Synch Rep

2008-11-14 Thread Fujii Masao
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 18:22 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > >> Yeah, I also add walsender as new auxiliary process at first. But, >> during coding, >> I made out that this is more complicated for code and user. >> >> First prob

Re: [HACKERS] Walsender process patch v1 for Synch Rep

2008-11-10 Thread Simon Riggs
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 18:22 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > Yeah, I also add walsender as new auxiliary process at first. But, > during coding, > I made out that this is more complicated for code and user. > > First problem : Which process accepts the connection from standby? > IMO, *postmaster* sho

Re: [HACKERS] Walsender process patch v1 for Synch Rep

2008-11-10 Thread Fujii Masao
Hi, Simon Thank you for the review. On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 23:17 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > >> Authentication >> --- >> As pointed out at another thread, for authentication, I defined the database >> on

Re: [HACKERS] Walsender process patch v1 for Synch Rep

2008-11-07 Thread Simon Riggs
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 23:17 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > Authentication > --- > As pointed out at another thread, for authentication, I defined the database > only for replication (named "walsender" tentatively). walsender database is > not pseudo but created by initdb like pos