On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 18:22 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I also add walsender as new auxiliary process at first. But,
>> during coding,
>> I made out that this is more complicated for code and user.
>>
>> First prob
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 18:22 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Yeah, I also add walsender as new auxiliary process at first. But,
> during coding,
> I made out that this is more complicated for code and user.
>
> First problem : Which process accepts the connection from standby?
> IMO, *postmaster* sho
Hi, Simon
Thank you for the review.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 23:17 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>> Authentication
>> ---
>> As pointed out at another thread, for authentication, I defined the database
>> on
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 23:17 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Authentication
> ---
> As pointed out at another thread, for authentication, I defined the database
> only for replication (named "walsender" tentatively). walsender database is
> not pseudo but created by initdb like pos