2011/3/9 Vlad Arkhipov :
> 09.03.2011 18:54, Nicolas Barbier:
>>
>> 2011/3/9 Vlad Arkhipov:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Let there are two transactions that were created with read commited
>>> isolation level. In the first one we're executing a SELECT query:
>>> SELECT * FROM t UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t;
>>>
>>>
09.03.2011 18:54, Nicolas Barbier:
2011/3/9 Vlad Arkhipov:
Let there are two transactions that were created with read commited
isolation level. In the first one we're executing a SELECT query:
SELECT * FROM t UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t;
In the second transaction we're modifying the same tab
2011/3/9 Nicolas Barbier :
> Note that the standard defines things that must never happen in the
> case of READ COMMITTED, it does not specify that one *must* be able to
> see the stuff as committed by previous transactions, for example.
Hmm, make that "stuff as committed by concurrent transactio
2011/3/9 Vlad Arkhipov :
> Let there are two transactions that were created with read commited
> isolation level. In the first one we're executing a SELECT query:
> SELECT * FROM t UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t;
>
> In the second transaction we're modifying the same table:
> INSERT INTO t DEFAULT VALU
