Re: [HACKERS] Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchiving is enabled

2007-10-17 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Simon Riggs wrote: If you've got a better problem statement it would be good to get that right first before we discuss solutions. Reusing a relfilenode of a deleted relation, before next checkpoint following the commit of the deleting transaction, for an operation that doesn't WAL log the

Re: [HACKERS] Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchiving is enabled

2007-10-17 Thread Simon Riggs
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 15:02 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: If you've got a better problem statement it would be good to get that right first before we discuss solutions. Reusing a relfilenode of a deleted relation, before next checkpoint following the commit of the