Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 and PG_MODULE_MAGIC

2006-09-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
URL added to TODO list. --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Even more interesting would be to fix things so that xml2 gets built as part of the regular contrib build, but I'm not sure if we're ready to add

Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 and PG_MODULE_MAGIC

2006-09-11 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: contrib/xml2 currently has PG_MODULE_MAGIC in xslt_proc.c, which results in a runtime error on systems that built the module without support for libxslt per the comments in the Makefile. Should PG_MODULE_MAGIC be in xpath.c instead? [ examines

Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 and PG_MODULE_MAGIC

2006-09-11 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: contrib/xml2 currently has PG_MODULE_MAGIC in xslt_proc.c, which results in a runtime error on systems that built the module without support for libxslt per the comments in the Makefile. Should PG_MODULE_MAGIC be in xpath.c instead?

Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 and PG_MODULE_MAGIC

2006-09-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: Even more interesting would be to fix things so that xml2 gets built as part of the regular contrib build, but I'm not sure if we're ready to add stuff to the configure script for the sole benefit of a contrib module. It might be good to get the configury code out in this