On Mon, 1 May 2006, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Hi,
Since yesterday (at least), the CVSup server has been down:
$ cvsup -g cvsup.pgsql
Cannot connect to cvsup.postgresql.org: Connection refused
Will retry at 14:08:50
I hope it has not been deprecated?
nope, just upgrade postgresql.org to FreeBSD
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Joe Conway wrote:
Although listed as RH9, the ones at http://www.joeconway.com/ work on
my FC2 machine. They don't work on FC3 however, and I haven't gotten
around to trying to rebuild on FC3.
If anyone's interested, I've rebuilt the packages for RHEL ES
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Joe Conway wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds of
CVSup:
Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps
Joe Conway said:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary
>>>builds of CVSup:
>>>Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but
>>>perhaps they are well-hidden).
>>
>>
>> If they are still
Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds
of CVSup:
Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps
they are well-hidden).
If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of da
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds
> of CVSup:
> Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps
> they are well-hidden).
If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of date :-(
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Joe Conway wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
In postgres.cvsup:
# complete distribution, including all below
pgsql
earthdistance
I've been using this in postgres.cvsup
# complete distribution, including all below
repository
I think Marc told me to use that at one point.
Yup, that
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
In postgres.cvsup:
# complete distribution, including all below
pgsql
earthdistance
I've been using this in postgres.cvsup
# complete distribution, including all below
repository
I think Marc told me to use that at one point.
Joe
---(end of broadcas
I wrote:
I've been trying to set up a cvsup mirror following the instructions
at http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/cvsup.html
However, it seems to be awry w.r.t. the earthdistance module. Could
some kind person please tell me what needs to be done in either the
cvsup config or the m
> > > Please confirm that this is in
> > > fact the 16_1d or 16_1e release!!
Thank you thank you thank you!!! I see that 16_1e is now installed on
the server, and the world is good again.
I'm about done with extensive patches on date/time support, though I
think I won't be ready to commit them b
> > What about the server versioning issue? I see no mention of
> > REL_16_1p as being safe to use. Please confirm that this is in
> > fact the 16_1d or 16_1e release!!
> This is what is/was latest in ports after you mentioned the problem ...
> I'll check ports again over the next day or so to see
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Fixed ... my exclude file had a rule in it that prevented odbc from being
> > rsync'd down ... all should be downloaded now ...
>
> Great! Haven't tested it yet, but Otto is happy so I'm sure I'll be
> too...
>
> > > Server software version: REL_16_
> Fixed ... my exclude file had a rule in it that prevented odbc from being
> rsync'd down ... all should be downloaded now ...
Great! Haven't tested it yet, but Otto is happy so I'm sure I'll be
too...
> > Server software version: REL_16_1p3
> > This does *not* seem to be fresh enough. JDP reco
Thanks Marc !
I just cvsup'ed and odbc seems to be all back.
Thanks !
Best regards,
.. Otto
Otto Hirr
OLAB Inc
503.617.6595
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marc
> G. Fournier
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 200
Fixed ... my exclude file had a rule in it that prevented odbc from being
rsync'd down ... all should be downloaded now ...
as for a 'sitemap', the server that all of this is on is meant to be
purelya 'mirror' of the central one on mail.postgresql.org, except there
are no accounts on the machine
> 2) I just sync'ed via cvsup at cvsup.postgresql.org and it deleted all
>under pgsql/src/interfaces/odbc/*. It also does not seem to appear
>anywhere else. What's up?
I see this too. I blew away my repository and populated it from scratch,
and still see the problem. In fact, the odbc d
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > $ ping cvsup.postgresql.org
> > PING rs.postgresql.org: 64 byte packets
> > 64 bytes from 64.39.15.238: icmp_seq=0. time=57. ms
> > 64 bytes from 64.39.15.238: icmp_seq=1. time=70. ms
> > Perhaps there is a routing problem somewhere between you and
> $ ping cvsup.postgresql.org
> PING rs.postgresql.org: 64 byte packets
> 64 bytes from 64.39.15.238: icmp_seq=0. time=57. ms
> 64 bytes from 64.39.15.238: icmp_seq=1. time=70. ms
> Perhaps there is a routing problem somewhere between you and 64.39.15.238?
> That machine is not physically at hub (
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for fixing it. Now of course the machine does not seem to be
> visible. That was the case yesterday too; are these planned outages, is
> it still bouncing up and down as it is configured, or is it flakey?
Looks fine from here:
$ ping cvsup.pos
Two points
1) I think that the problem with restarting at boot has occurred before.
2) I just sync'ed via cvsup at cvsup.postgresql.org and it deleted all
under pgsql/src/interfaces/odbc/*. It also does not seem to appear
anywhere else. What's up?
This is my client version:
(193)-> cvsup
just checked, and the machine has been up 14days now ... I can ssh into it
from cvs.postgresql.org, and the last cvsup connection was about 5 minutes
ago:
Sep 21 09:10:42 server1 cvsupd[50149]: +3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (fs1.olabinc.com)
[SNAP_16_1e/16.1]
Sep 21 09:11:53 server1 cvsupd[50149]: -3 [1
> Okay, that is fixed ... for some reason, it didn't restart on last reboot,
> have to watch that one ...
Thanks for fixing it. Now of course the machine does not seem to be
visible. That was the case yesterday too; are these planned outages, is
it still bouncing up and down as it is configured,
Okay, that is fixed ... for some reason, it didn't restart on last reboot,
have to watch that one ...
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> I'm trying to update my cvs tree and am currently seeing the following:
>
> Parsing supfile "postgres.cvsup"
> Connecting to cvsup.postgresql.or
23 matches
Mail list logo
